A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder

Gordon J.G. Asmundson, Audur S. Thorisdottir, Jacob W. Roden-Foreman, Scarlett O. Baird, Sara M. Witcraft, Aliza T. Stein, Jasper Smits, Mark Powers

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Two prior meta-analyses of studies are available but used approaches that limit conclusions that can be drawn regarding the impact of CPT on PTSD outcomes. The current meta-analysis reviewed outcomes of trials that tested the efficacy of CPT for PTSD in adults and evaluated potential moderators of outcomes. All published trials comparing CPT against an inactive control condition (i.e. psychological placebo or wait-list) or other active treatment for PTSD in adults were included, resulting in 11 studies with a total of 1130 participants. CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment (mean Hedges’ g = 1.24) and follow-up (mean Hedges’ g = 0.90). The average CPT-treated participant fared better than 89% of those in inactive control conditions at posttreatment and 82% at follow-up. Results also showed that CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on non-PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment and follow-up and that CPT outperformed other active treatments at posttreatment but not at follow-up. Effect sizes of CPT on PTSD symptoms were not significantly moderated by participant age, number of treatment sessions, total sample size, length of follow-up, or group versus individual treatment; but, older studies had larger effect sizes and percent female sex moderated the effect of CPT on non-PTSD outcomes. These meta-analytic findings indicate that CPT is an effective PTSD treatment with lasting benefits across a range of outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalCognitive Behaviour Therapy
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2019

Fingerprint

Cognitive Therapy
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Meta-Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
Sample Size
Placebos
Psychology

Keywords

  • CPT
  • Meta-analysis
  • cognitive processing therapy
  • posttraumatic stress disorder
  • review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Asmundson, G. J. G., Thorisdottir, A. S., Roden-Foreman, J. W., Baird, S. O., Witcraft, S. M., Stein, A. T., ... Powers, M. (2019). A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 48(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2018.1522371

A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder. / Asmundson, Gordon J.G.; Thorisdottir, Audur S.; Roden-Foreman, Jacob W.; Baird, Scarlett O.; Witcraft, Sara M.; Stein, Aliza T.; Smits, Jasper; Powers, Mark.

In: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Vol. 48, No. 1, 02.01.2019, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Asmundson GJG, Thorisdottir AS, Roden-Foreman JW, Baird SO, Witcraft SM, Stein AT et al. A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 2019 Jan 2;48(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2018.1522371
Asmundson, Gordon J.G. ; Thorisdottir, Audur S. ; Roden-Foreman, Jacob W. ; Baird, Scarlett O. ; Witcraft, Sara M. ; Stein, Aliza T. ; Smits, Jasper ; Powers, Mark. / A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder. In: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. 2019 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 1-14.
@article{ace299bca32a4059b16413a72a332d2c,
title = "A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder",
abstract = "Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Two prior meta-analyses of studies are available but used approaches that limit conclusions that can be drawn regarding the impact of CPT on PTSD outcomes. The current meta-analysis reviewed outcomes of trials that tested the efficacy of CPT for PTSD in adults and evaluated potential moderators of outcomes. All published trials comparing CPT against an inactive control condition (i.e. psychological placebo or wait-list) or other active treatment for PTSD in adults were included, resulting in 11 studies with a total of 1130 participants. CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment (mean Hedges’ g = 1.24) and follow-up (mean Hedges’ g = 0.90). The average CPT-treated participant fared better than 89{\%} of those in inactive control conditions at posttreatment and 82{\%} at follow-up. Results also showed that CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on non-PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment and follow-up and that CPT outperformed other active treatments at posttreatment but not at follow-up. Effect sizes of CPT on PTSD symptoms were not significantly moderated by participant age, number of treatment sessions, total sample size, length of follow-up, or group versus individual treatment; but, older studies had larger effect sizes and percent female sex moderated the effect of CPT on non-PTSD outcomes. These meta-analytic findings indicate that CPT is an effective PTSD treatment with lasting benefits across a range of outcomes.",
keywords = "CPT, Meta-analysis, cognitive processing therapy, posttraumatic stress disorder, review",
author = "Asmundson, {Gordon J.G.} and Thorisdottir, {Audur S.} and Roden-Foreman, {Jacob W.} and Baird, {Scarlett O.} and Witcraft, {Sara M.} and Stein, {Aliza T.} and Jasper Smits and Mark Powers",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/16506073.2018.1522371",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Cognitive Behaviour Therapy",
issn = "1650-6073",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis AS",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A meta-analytic review of cognitive processing therapy for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder

AU - Asmundson, Gordon J.G.

AU - Thorisdottir, Audur S.

AU - Roden-Foreman, Jacob W.

AU - Baird, Scarlett O.

AU - Witcraft, Sara M.

AU - Stein, Aliza T.

AU - Smits, Jasper

AU - Powers, Mark

PY - 2019/1/2

Y1 - 2019/1/2

N2 - Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Two prior meta-analyses of studies are available but used approaches that limit conclusions that can be drawn regarding the impact of CPT on PTSD outcomes. The current meta-analysis reviewed outcomes of trials that tested the efficacy of CPT for PTSD in adults and evaluated potential moderators of outcomes. All published trials comparing CPT against an inactive control condition (i.e. psychological placebo or wait-list) or other active treatment for PTSD in adults were included, resulting in 11 studies with a total of 1130 participants. CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment (mean Hedges’ g = 1.24) and follow-up (mean Hedges’ g = 0.90). The average CPT-treated participant fared better than 89% of those in inactive control conditions at posttreatment and 82% at follow-up. Results also showed that CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on non-PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment and follow-up and that CPT outperformed other active treatments at posttreatment but not at follow-up. Effect sizes of CPT on PTSD symptoms were not significantly moderated by participant age, number of treatment sessions, total sample size, length of follow-up, or group versus individual treatment; but, older studies had larger effect sizes and percent female sex moderated the effect of CPT on non-PTSD outcomes. These meta-analytic findings indicate that CPT is an effective PTSD treatment with lasting benefits across a range of outcomes.

AB - Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for treating posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Two prior meta-analyses of studies are available but used approaches that limit conclusions that can be drawn regarding the impact of CPT on PTSD outcomes. The current meta-analysis reviewed outcomes of trials that tested the efficacy of CPT for PTSD in adults and evaluated potential moderators of outcomes. All published trials comparing CPT against an inactive control condition (i.e. psychological placebo or wait-list) or other active treatment for PTSD in adults were included, resulting in 11 studies with a total of 1130 participants. CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment (mean Hedges’ g = 1.24) and follow-up (mean Hedges’ g = 0.90). The average CPT-treated participant fared better than 89% of those in inactive control conditions at posttreatment and 82% at follow-up. Results also showed that CPT outperformed inactive control conditions on non-PTSD outcome measures at posttreatment and follow-up and that CPT outperformed other active treatments at posttreatment but not at follow-up. Effect sizes of CPT on PTSD symptoms were not significantly moderated by participant age, number of treatment sessions, total sample size, length of follow-up, or group versus individual treatment; but, older studies had larger effect sizes and percent female sex moderated the effect of CPT on non-PTSD outcomes. These meta-analytic findings indicate that CPT is an effective PTSD treatment with lasting benefits across a range of outcomes.

KW - CPT

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - cognitive processing therapy

KW - posttraumatic stress disorder

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055176254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055176254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/16506073.2018.1522371

DO - 10.1080/16506073.2018.1522371

M3 - Review article

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

JF - Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

SN - 1650-6073

IS - 1

ER -