Addressing medically underserved populations through maternal-fetal transport: a geographic analysis

Joshua I. Rosenbloom, D. Michael Nelson, Scott Saunders, F. Sessions Cole, Janet Chandarlis, George Macones, Alison Cahill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Despite regionalization of maternal care in the USA, there is little contemporary information on characteristics and utilization of maternal–fetal transport. We used geographic analysis to investigate referral and transportation patterns of the maternal–fetal transport service at our institution. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all calls taken by our maternal–fetal transfer service. Call logs were abstracted, and diagnoses, gestational ages, referring hospital, and mode of transportation were analyzed. The United States Health Resources and Services Administration’s Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designations were used to identify hospitals in these areas. Geographic information system software was used to analyze and map geographic variables, including frequency of transfers from each hospital, distance traveled, mode of transfer, and MUAs. Results: From November 2012 to March 2017, there were 835 telephone consults without transfer and 1682 patients transferred from 103 hospitals. Preterm labor was the most common diagnosis (n = 338, 20%), followed by hypertensive disorders (n = 231, 14%). There were 738 transfers (44%) from MUAs, and 20 (19%) of hospitals were critical access hospitals, accounting for 121 (7%) transfers. One-way trips from a referring hospital accounted for 659 patients, and the transport team was dispatched in 1023 cases. The median distance traveled was 24 mi. For hospitals within 50 mi, the mean difference in transport time between air and ground was <1 h, yet there were 73 air round trips for hospitals <50 mi from our hospital. Conclusion: The transfer system is robust and supports underserved hospitals; however, the service could be deployed more efficiently.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Mothers
Medically Underserved Area
United States Health Resources and Services Administration
Air
Patient Transfer
Geographic Information Systems
Premature Obstetric Labor
Telephone
Gestational Age
Cohort Studies
Referral and Consultation
Software
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Geographic analysis
  • maternal–fetal transport
  • medical transportation
  • regional perinatal care
  • underserved areas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Rosenbloom, J. I., Nelson, D. M., Saunders, S., Cole, F. S., Chandarlis, J., Macones, G., & Cahill, A. (Accepted/In press). Addressing medically underserved populations through maternal-fetal transport: a geographic analysis. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1564028

Addressing medically underserved populations through maternal-fetal transport : a geographic analysis. / Rosenbloom, Joshua I.; Nelson, D. Michael; Saunders, Scott; Cole, F. Sessions; Chandarlis, Janet; Macones, George; Cahill, Alison.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenbloom, Joshua I. ; Nelson, D. Michael ; Saunders, Scott ; Cole, F. Sessions ; Chandarlis, Janet ; Macones, George ; Cahill, Alison. / Addressing medically underserved populations through maternal-fetal transport : a geographic analysis. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019.
@article{626cbb8d70a1489ba3c5c47b7f1726e8,
title = "Addressing medically underserved populations through maternal-fetal transport: a geographic analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Despite regionalization of maternal care in the USA, there is little contemporary information on characteristics and utilization of maternal–fetal transport. We used geographic analysis to investigate referral and transportation patterns of the maternal–fetal transport service at our institution. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all calls taken by our maternal–fetal transfer service. Call logs were abstracted, and diagnoses, gestational ages, referring hospital, and mode of transportation were analyzed. The United States Health Resources and Services Administration’s Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designations were used to identify hospitals in these areas. Geographic information system software was used to analyze and map geographic variables, including frequency of transfers from each hospital, distance traveled, mode of transfer, and MUAs. Results: From November 2012 to March 2017, there were 835 telephone consults without transfer and 1682 patients transferred from 103 hospitals. Preterm labor was the most common diagnosis (n = 338, 20{\%}), followed by hypertensive disorders (n = 231, 14{\%}). There were 738 transfers (44{\%}) from MUAs, and 20 (19{\%}) of hospitals were critical access hospitals, accounting for 121 (7{\%}) transfers. One-way trips from a referring hospital accounted for 659 patients, and the transport team was dispatched in 1023 cases. The median distance traveled was 24 mi. For hospitals within 50 mi, the mean difference in transport time between air and ground was <1 h, yet there were 73 air round trips for hospitals <50 mi from our hospital. Conclusion: The transfer system is robust and supports underserved hospitals; however, the service could be deployed more efficiently.",
keywords = "Geographic analysis, maternal–fetal transport, medical transportation, regional perinatal care, underserved areas",
author = "Rosenbloom, {Joshua I.} and Nelson, {D. Michael} and Scott Saunders and Cole, {F. Sessions} and Janet Chandarlis and George Macones and Alison Cahill",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14767058.2018.1564028",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing medically underserved populations through maternal-fetal transport

T2 - a geographic analysis

AU - Rosenbloom, Joshua I.

AU - Nelson, D. Michael

AU - Saunders, Scott

AU - Cole, F. Sessions

AU - Chandarlis, Janet

AU - Macones, George

AU - Cahill, Alison

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: Despite regionalization of maternal care in the USA, there is little contemporary information on characteristics and utilization of maternal–fetal transport. We used geographic analysis to investigate referral and transportation patterns of the maternal–fetal transport service at our institution. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all calls taken by our maternal–fetal transfer service. Call logs were abstracted, and diagnoses, gestational ages, referring hospital, and mode of transportation were analyzed. The United States Health Resources and Services Administration’s Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designations were used to identify hospitals in these areas. Geographic information system software was used to analyze and map geographic variables, including frequency of transfers from each hospital, distance traveled, mode of transfer, and MUAs. Results: From November 2012 to March 2017, there were 835 telephone consults without transfer and 1682 patients transferred from 103 hospitals. Preterm labor was the most common diagnosis (n = 338, 20%), followed by hypertensive disorders (n = 231, 14%). There were 738 transfers (44%) from MUAs, and 20 (19%) of hospitals were critical access hospitals, accounting for 121 (7%) transfers. One-way trips from a referring hospital accounted for 659 patients, and the transport team was dispatched in 1023 cases. The median distance traveled was 24 mi. For hospitals within 50 mi, the mean difference in transport time between air and ground was <1 h, yet there were 73 air round trips for hospitals <50 mi from our hospital. Conclusion: The transfer system is robust and supports underserved hospitals; however, the service could be deployed more efficiently.

AB - Objective: Despite regionalization of maternal care in the USA, there is little contemporary information on characteristics and utilization of maternal–fetal transport. We used geographic analysis to investigate referral and transportation patterns of the maternal–fetal transport service at our institution. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of all calls taken by our maternal–fetal transfer service. Call logs were abstracted, and diagnoses, gestational ages, referring hospital, and mode of transportation were analyzed. The United States Health Resources and Services Administration’s Medically Underserved Area (MUA) designations were used to identify hospitals in these areas. Geographic information system software was used to analyze and map geographic variables, including frequency of transfers from each hospital, distance traveled, mode of transfer, and MUAs. Results: From November 2012 to March 2017, there were 835 telephone consults without transfer and 1682 patients transferred from 103 hospitals. Preterm labor was the most common diagnosis (n = 338, 20%), followed by hypertensive disorders (n = 231, 14%). There were 738 transfers (44%) from MUAs, and 20 (19%) of hospitals were critical access hospitals, accounting for 121 (7%) transfers. One-way trips from a referring hospital accounted for 659 patients, and the transport team was dispatched in 1023 cases. The median distance traveled was 24 mi. For hospitals within 50 mi, the mean difference in transport time between air and ground was <1 h, yet there were 73 air round trips for hospitals <50 mi from our hospital. Conclusion: The transfer system is robust and supports underserved hospitals; however, the service could be deployed more efficiently.

KW - Geographic analysis

KW - maternal–fetal transport

KW - medical transportation

KW - regional perinatal care

KW - underserved areas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059697244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059697244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14767058.2018.1564028

DO - 10.1080/14767058.2018.1564028

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85059697244

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

ER -