Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis

David Scott Yeager, Carlton J. Fong, Hae Yeon Lee, Dorothy L. Espelage

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

134 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Highly visible tragedies in high schools thought to involve bullying have directly contributed to public support for state-mandated K-12 anti-bullying programming. But are existing programs actually effective for these older adolescents? This paper first outlines theoretical considerations, including developmental changes in (a) the manifestation of bullying, (b) the underlying causes of bullying, and (c) the efficacy of domain-general behavior-change tactics. This review leads to the prediction of a discontinuity in program efficacy among older adolescents. The paper then reports a novel meta-analysis of studies that administered the same program to multiple age groups and measured levels of bullying (k= 19, with 72 effect sizes). By conducting a hierarchical meta-analysis of the within-study moderation of efficacy by age, more precise estimates of age-related trends were possible. Results were consistent with theory in that whereas bullying appears to be effectively prevented in 7th grade and below, in 8th grade and beyond there is a sharp drop to an average of zero. This finding contradicts past meta-analyses that used between-study tests of moderation. This paper provides a basis for a theory of age-related moderation of program effects that may generalize to other domains. The findings also suggest the more general need for caution when interpreting between-study meta-analytic moderation results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-51
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Bullying
Meta-Analysis
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Bullying
  • Interventions
  • Meta-analysis
  • Victimization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents : Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. / Yeager, David Scott; Fong, Carlton J.; Lee, Hae Yeon; Espelage, Dorothy L.

In: Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 36-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Yeager, David Scott ; Fong, Carlton J. ; Lee, Hae Yeon ; Espelage, Dorothy L. / Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents : Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. In: Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 36-51.
@article{6c86e57221ef4fd5a615f1b79901cae9,
title = "Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis",
abstract = "Highly visible tragedies in high schools thought to involve bullying have directly contributed to public support for state-mandated K-12 anti-bullying programming. But are existing programs actually effective for these older adolescents? This paper first outlines theoretical considerations, including developmental changes in (a) the manifestation of bullying, (b) the underlying causes of bullying, and (c) the efficacy of domain-general behavior-change tactics. This review leads to the prediction of a discontinuity in program efficacy among older adolescents. The paper then reports a novel meta-analysis of studies that administered the same program to multiple age groups and measured levels of bullying (k= 19, with 72 effect sizes). By conducting a hierarchical meta-analysis of the within-study moderation of efficacy by age, more precise estimates of age-related trends were possible. Results were consistent with theory in that whereas bullying appears to be effectively prevented in 7th grade and below, in 8th grade and beyond there is a sharp drop to an average of zero. This finding contradicts past meta-analyses that used between-study tests of moderation. This paper provides a basis for a theory of age-related moderation of program effects that may generalize to other domains. The findings also suggest the more general need for caution when interpreting between-study meta-analytic moderation results.",
keywords = "Adolescence, Bullying, Interventions, Meta-analysis, Victimization",
author = "Yeager, {David Scott} and Fong, {Carlton J.} and Lee, {Hae Yeon} and Espelage, {Dorothy L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "36--51",
journal = "Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0193-3973",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents

T2 - Theory and a three-level meta-analysis

AU - Yeager, David Scott

AU - Fong, Carlton J.

AU - Lee, Hae Yeon

AU - Espelage, Dorothy L.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Highly visible tragedies in high schools thought to involve bullying have directly contributed to public support for state-mandated K-12 anti-bullying programming. But are existing programs actually effective for these older adolescents? This paper first outlines theoretical considerations, including developmental changes in (a) the manifestation of bullying, (b) the underlying causes of bullying, and (c) the efficacy of domain-general behavior-change tactics. This review leads to the prediction of a discontinuity in program efficacy among older adolescents. The paper then reports a novel meta-analysis of studies that administered the same program to multiple age groups and measured levels of bullying (k= 19, with 72 effect sizes). By conducting a hierarchical meta-analysis of the within-study moderation of efficacy by age, more precise estimates of age-related trends were possible. Results were consistent with theory in that whereas bullying appears to be effectively prevented in 7th grade and below, in 8th grade and beyond there is a sharp drop to an average of zero. This finding contradicts past meta-analyses that used between-study tests of moderation. This paper provides a basis for a theory of age-related moderation of program effects that may generalize to other domains. The findings also suggest the more general need for caution when interpreting between-study meta-analytic moderation results.

AB - Highly visible tragedies in high schools thought to involve bullying have directly contributed to public support for state-mandated K-12 anti-bullying programming. But are existing programs actually effective for these older adolescents? This paper first outlines theoretical considerations, including developmental changes in (a) the manifestation of bullying, (b) the underlying causes of bullying, and (c) the efficacy of domain-general behavior-change tactics. This review leads to the prediction of a discontinuity in program efficacy among older adolescents. The paper then reports a novel meta-analysis of studies that administered the same program to multiple age groups and measured levels of bullying (k= 19, with 72 effect sizes). By conducting a hierarchical meta-analysis of the within-study moderation of efficacy by age, more precise estimates of age-related trends were possible. Results were consistent with theory in that whereas bullying appears to be effectively prevented in 7th grade and below, in 8th grade and beyond there is a sharp drop to an average of zero. This finding contradicts past meta-analyses that used between-study tests of moderation. This paper provides a basis for a theory of age-related moderation of program effects that may generalize to other domains. The findings also suggest the more general need for caution when interpreting between-study meta-analytic moderation results.

KW - Adolescence

KW - Bullying

KW - Interventions

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84933179733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84933179733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84933179733

VL - 37

SP - 36

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

SN - 0193-3973

IS - 1

ER -