Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others

Daniel M. Zane, Julie R. Irwin, Rebecca Walker Reczek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This research shows that consumers who willfully ignore ethical product attributes denigrate other, more ethical consumers who seek out and use this information in making purchase decisions. Across three studies, willfully ignorant consumers negatively judge ethical others they have never met across various disparate personality traits (e.g., fashionable, boring). The denigration arises from the self-threat inherent in negative social comparison with others who acted ethically instead of choosing not to do so. In addition, this denigration has detrimental downstream consequences, undermining the denigrator's commitment to ethical values, as evidenced by reduced anger toward firms who violate the ethical principle in question and reduced intention to behave ethically in the future. There are two moderators of the effect: Denigration becomes less strong if willfully ignorant consumers have a second opportunity to act ethically after initially ignoring the ethical product information and also significantly weakens if initially ignoring the ethical attribute is seen as justifiable. These results have implications for understanding ethical consumption behavior, perceptions of ethical consumerism in general, and marketing of ethical products.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)337-349
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Consumer Psychology
    Volume26
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Anger
    Marketing
    Personality
    Decision Making
    Research
    Ignorance

    Keywords

    • Ethical attributes
    • Ethical consumer behavior
    • Morality
    • Social comparison
    • Sustainability
    • Willful ignorance

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology
    • Marketing

    Cite this

    Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others. / Zane, Daniel M.; Irwin, Julie R.; Reczek, Rebecca Walker.

    In: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.07.2016, p. 337-349.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Zane, Daniel M. ; Irwin, Julie R. ; Reczek, Rebecca Walker. / Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others. In: Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 337-349.
    @article{deaabefdd4a74777847ae4a11dd41ae4,
    title = "Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others",
    abstract = "This research shows that consumers who willfully ignore ethical product attributes denigrate other, more ethical consumers who seek out and use this information in making purchase decisions. Across three studies, willfully ignorant consumers negatively judge ethical others they have never met across various disparate personality traits (e.g., fashionable, boring). The denigration arises from the self-threat inherent in negative social comparison with others who acted ethically instead of choosing not to do so. In addition, this denigration has detrimental downstream consequences, undermining the denigrator's commitment to ethical values, as evidenced by reduced anger toward firms who violate the ethical principle in question and reduced intention to behave ethically in the future. There are two moderators of the effect: Denigration becomes less strong if willfully ignorant consumers have a second opportunity to act ethically after initially ignoring the ethical product information and also significantly weakens if initially ignoring the ethical attribute is seen as justifiable. These results have implications for understanding ethical consumption behavior, perceptions of ethical consumerism in general, and marketing of ethical products.",
    keywords = "Ethical attributes, Ethical consumer behavior, Morality, Social comparison, Sustainability, Willful ignorance",
    author = "Zane, {Daniel M.} and Irwin, {Julie R.} and Reczek, {Rebecca Walker}",
    year = "2016",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jcps.2015.10.002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "337--349",
    journal = "Journal of Consumer Psychology",
    issn = "1057-7408",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others

    AU - Zane, Daniel M.

    AU - Irwin, Julie R.

    AU - Reczek, Rebecca Walker

    PY - 2016/7/1

    Y1 - 2016/7/1

    N2 - This research shows that consumers who willfully ignore ethical product attributes denigrate other, more ethical consumers who seek out and use this information in making purchase decisions. Across three studies, willfully ignorant consumers negatively judge ethical others they have never met across various disparate personality traits (e.g., fashionable, boring). The denigration arises from the self-threat inherent in negative social comparison with others who acted ethically instead of choosing not to do so. In addition, this denigration has detrimental downstream consequences, undermining the denigrator's commitment to ethical values, as evidenced by reduced anger toward firms who violate the ethical principle in question and reduced intention to behave ethically in the future. There are two moderators of the effect: Denigration becomes less strong if willfully ignorant consumers have a second opportunity to act ethically after initially ignoring the ethical product information and also significantly weakens if initially ignoring the ethical attribute is seen as justifiable. These results have implications for understanding ethical consumption behavior, perceptions of ethical consumerism in general, and marketing of ethical products.

    AB - This research shows that consumers who willfully ignore ethical product attributes denigrate other, more ethical consumers who seek out and use this information in making purchase decisions. Across three studies, willfully ignorant consumers negatively judge ethical others they have never met across various disparate personality traits (e.g., fashionable, boring). The denigration arises from the self-threat inherent in negative social comparison with others who acted ethically instead of choosing not to do so. In addition, this denigration has detrimental downstream consequences, undermining the denigrator's commitment to ethical values, as evidenced by reduced anger toward firms who violate the ethical principle in question and reduced intention to behave ethically in the future. There are two moderators of the effect: Denigration becomes less strong if willfully ignorant consumers have a second opportunity to act ethically after initially ignoring the ethical product information and also significantly weakens if initially ignoring the ethical attribute is seen as justifiable. These results have implications for understanding ethical consumption behavior, perceptions of ethical consumerism in general, and marketing of ethical products.

    KW - Ethical attributes

    KW - Ethical consumer behavior

    KW - Morality

    KW - Social comparison

    KW - Sustainability

    KW - Willful ignorance

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949257212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949257212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.10.002

    DO - 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.10.002

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84949257212

    VL - 26

    SP - 337

    EP - 349

    JO - Journal of Consumer Psychology

    JF - Journal of Consumer Psychology

    SN - 1057-7408

    IS - 3

    ER -