Does resiliency mediate the association of psychological adaptability with disability and pain in patients with an upper extremity injury or illness?

Joost T.P. Kortlever, Mark H.F. Keulen, Teun Teunis, David Ring, Matt D. Driscoll, Lee M. Reichel, Gregg A. Vagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations are highly variable for a given nociception and pathophysiology. As psychological determinants are of great influence to physical wellbeing, we assessed the influence of the protective factor measured and labelled as resilience in upper extremity illness. Methods: One hundred and six patients completed a survey of demographics, the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS), an 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity, and the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT). Measures of pain intensity and PROMIS PF were repeated 3 months later. We created mediation models using structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the mediation effect of BRS on the association of PAS and other confounding variables with disability and pain at initial assessment and 3 months later. Results: Resiliency does not mediate the association of psychological adaptability with physical limitations and pain intensity at baseline (P =.89 and.82 respectively) or 3 months after enrollment (P =.65 and.72 respectively). Conclusions: Positive and protective factors promote beneficial resilience mechanisms that strengthen coping responses to pain and disability. In future studies we should either include more patients to improve power and provide more information about the health benefits of resilience or focus more on mood and self-efficacy on symptoms and limitations in patients with musculoskeletal illness. Level of evidence: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study; Level II.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume117
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Psychology
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Psychological Adaptation
Nociception
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Structural Models
Insurance Benefits
Self Efficacy
Longitudinal Studies
Cohort Studies
Demography
Protective Factors

Keywords

  • Mediation analysis
  • Pain
  • Physical limitations
  • Psychological adaptability
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Does resiliency mediate the association of psychological adaptability with disability and pain in patients with an upper extremity injury or illness? / Kortlever, Joost T.P.; Keulen, Mark H.F.; Teunis, Teun; Ring, David; Driscoll, Matt D.; Reichel, Lee M.; Vagner, Gregg A.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 117, 02.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d267854a233401c97211b3ab03ab0dc,
title = "Does resiliency mediate the association of psychological adaptability with disability and pain in patients with an upper extremity injury or illness?",
abstract = "Objective: Symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations are highly variable for a given nociception and pathophysiology. As psychological determinants are of great influence to physical wellbeing, we assessed the influence of the protective factor measured and labelled as resilience in upper extremity illness. Methods: One hundred and six patients completed a survey of demographics, the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS), an 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity, and the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT). Measures of pain intensity and PROMIS PF were repeated 3 months later. We created mediation models using structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the mediation effect of BRS on the association of PAS and other confounding variables with disability and pain at initial assessment and 3 months later. Results: Resiliency does not mediate the association of psychological adaptability with physical limitations and pain intensity at baseline (P =.89 and.82 respectively) or 3 months after enrollment (P =.65 and.72 respectively). Conclusions: Positive and protective factors promote beneficial resilience mechanisms that strengthen coping responses to pain and disability. In future studies we should either include more patients to improve power and provide more information about the health benefits of resilience or focus more on mood and self-efficacy on symptoms and limitations in patients with musculoskeletal illness. Level of evidence: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study; Level II.",
keywords = "Mediation analysis, Pain, Physical limitations, Psychological adaptability, Resilience",
author = "Kortlever, {Joost T.P.} and Keulen, {Mark H.F.} and Teun Teunis and David Ring and Driscoll, {Matt D.} and Reichel, {Lee M.} and Vagner, {Gregg A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.12.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does resiliency mediate the association of psychological adaptability with disability and pain in patients with an upper extremity injury or illness?

AU - Kortlever, Joost T.P.

AU - Keulen, Mark H.F.

AU - Teunis, Teun

AU - Ring, David

AU - Driscoll, Matt D.

AU - Reichel, Lee M.

AU - Vagner, Gregg A.

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Objective: Symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations are highly variable for a given nociception and pathophysiology. As psychological determinants are of great influence to physical wellbeing, we assessed the influence of the protective factor measured and labelled as resilience in upper extremity illness. Methods: One hundred and six patients completed a survey of demographics, the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS), an 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity, and the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT). Measures of pain intensity and PROMIS PF were repeated 3 months later. We created mediation models using structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the mediation effect of BRS on the association of PAS and other confounding variables with disability and pain at initial assessment and 3 months later. Results: Resiliency does not mediate the association of psychological adaptability with physical limitations and pain intensity at baseline (P =.89 and.82 respectively) or 3 months after enrollment (P =.65 and.72 respectively). Conclusions: Positive and protective factors promote beneficial resilience mechanisms that strengthen coping responses to pain and disability. In future studies we should either include more patients to improve power and provide more information about the health benefits of resilience or focus more on mood and self-efficacy on symptoms and limitations in patients with musculoskeletal illness. Level of evidence: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study; Level II.

AB - Objective: Symptom intensity and magnitude of limitations are highly variable for a given nociception and pathophysiology. As psychological determinants are of great influence to physical wellbeing, we assessed the influence of the protective factor measured and labelled as resilience in upper extremity illness. Methods: One hundred and six patients completed a survey of demographics, the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), the Psychological Adaptation Scale (PAS), an 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity, and the PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS PF) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT). Measures of pain intensity and PROMIS PF were repeated 3 months later. We created mediation models using structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the mediation effect of BRS on the association of PAS and other confounding variables with disability and pain at initial assessment and 3 months later. Results: Resiliency does not mediate the association of psychological adaptability with physical limitations and pain intensity at baseline (P =.89 and.82 respectively) or 3 months after enrollment (P =.65 and.72 respectively). Conclusions: Positive and protective factors promote beneficial resilience mechanisms that strengthen coping responses to pain and disability. In future studies we should either include more patients to improve power and provide more information about the health benefits of resilience or focus more on mood and self-efficacy on symptoms and limitations in patients with musculoskeletal illness. Level of evidence: Prospective, longitudinal cohort study; Level II.

KW - Mediation analysis

KW - Pain

KW - Physical limitations

KW - Psychological adaptability

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058183212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058183212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.12.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 30665589

AN - SCOPUS:85058183212

VL - 117

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

ER -